Category: Student Motivation

Scaffolding of Writing

Learning how to write is often hard, cumbersome. Individuals do not come preprogrammed to write. Writing words onto paper begins with learning how to speak. Toddlers learn to string words into sentences through the layers of their environment. The immediate layer (home) is usually the most influential. Toddlers’ sentences may also be influenced through books read to them. Children may also be influenced by exposure of different media sources and people’s conversation in the production of spoken sentences. Many students struggle in how to put their spoken words onto paper.

Writing is a higher cognitive processing order and is often very laborious for students. Students usually learn how to write through (explicit, modeled) instruction and many hours of practice. Using writing topics that spark students’ intrinsic motivation usually eases the process. There are many different types or styles of writing that may also spark students’ motivation to write. Using tangible scaffolds may also assist students’ motivation to participate in the writing process.

Scaffolding instruction means, providing “a supportive instructional structure that teachers use to provide the appropriate mechanisms for a student to complete a task that is beyond their unassisted abilities” (Ray, 2017, p.14). van de Pol, Volman, & Beishuizen (2010) suggests that there are three levels of scaffolding instruction-contingency, fading, and transfer of responsibility. The type of mechanism to use for scaffolding instruction or completion of an assignment will depend on the task and the student. During the contingency stage of instruction teachers will usually adjust and model completion of task to meet the learning needs of the current student(s). During the fading stage of instruction students are beginning to complete assignments on their own with some assistance from students or teachers of higher cognitive abilities. Students do not own the ability to complete the task effectively without some assistance at this stage. At times the assistance may come in the way of a scaffolding mechanism that may not be a human, such as a graphic organizer or chart. Often how to use the mechanism is taught during the contingency phase of the scaffolding process. Some mechanisms that might be used during writing instruction include:

  • assistance in developing a descriptive word list to use for writing a passage
  • graphs
  • suggesting types of sentences to write in this section
  • sentence stems
  • writing different parts of a writing piece as separate tasks
  • discussions related to the topic
  • examples of appropriate sentences to include in their writing. I like to use appropriate sentences provided by other students as examples. Student may use these sentences or develop their own.

The final stage of the scaffolding process, transfer of responsibility implies that a student is able to complete the task without assistance, such as produce an organized, cohesive paragraph about a suggested topic or write a sentence using the correct punctuation.

Scaffolds usually increase student motivation and decrease stress and anxiety. Scaffolds often allow students to focus on smaller pieces of the task. Scaffolds are meant to be temporary and should be removed as student gains more ownership in the ability to accomplish the goal. Students often move back and forth between the different stages of the scaffolding process until they reach full ownership of a task. Each student will have different patterns of movement through the scaffolding stages, often dependent on the initial instruction given, background knowledge of student, and student abilities.

References

Ray, J. S. (2017). Tier 2 intervention for students in grades 1-3 identified as at-risk in reading. (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3826/

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Education Psychology Review, 22, 271-296. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.

What is Partner Reading?

The instructional strategy partner reading looks different depending on the classroom and students. Partner reading provides opportunity for social and academic support. Partner reading also encourages motivation and provides opportunity for practice. This strategy at times becomes the teacher’s extended arms and mouth of instruction. Partner reading usually includes two students reading a book and at times discussing the contents of the book. The benefits are vast. See my post of June 2022.

The biggest challenge to “partner reading” is student collaborative skills. Students bring their individual intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, and knowledge to a group. These skills are combined with their partner’s skills to solve or work through the given task. Some students fall into these skills naturally through observation and participation of social interactions—beginning at birth. Some students will need explicit modeling of what and how these skills are practiced in a group setting. Most students will need to know the “ground rules” of what is excepted and not excepted during partner work in your classroom. The amount of repetition of ground rules will depend on the grade and prior experience of the students participating. Most students like to share and work with a partner.

Educators use different names and definitions for the instructional strategy of “partner reading”. Some of those names and definitions are noted below.

  • Partner Reading. I define partner reading “as two students orally reading a teacher chosen passage or book at their independent reading level, taking turns with their teacher chosen partner to read and listen to a book or passage. Students are intentionally paired higher-level readers with lower-level readers. Each student receives a teacher chosen book to read at their current independent instructional reading-level. While one student is reading the other student is listening or assisting their partner to read” (Ray, 2022).
  • Buddy reading is defined as two students reading a book of their choosing at their independent reading level. This instructional strategy is most often used to pair students of different grades levels, such as Grade 5 students and Kindergarteners reading their independent reading-level book to each other. This strategy may also be used in one classroom. Some buddy reading groups are encouraged to ask questions about the passage read. One student reads while the other student listens. Student are encouraged to sit side-by-side, so that the listener can see the reader’s page. Teachers usually sets a time for students to read—five or ten minutes, or the whole passage. This strategy usually promotes motivation for students to read. Students often scaffold the reading and comprehension process for each other.
  • Paired reading. Reading Rockets (2022) defines paired reading as a research-based fluency strategy for students who struggling with reading fluency. Students of the same reading level often reread the same passage to build fluency. Students are paired higher-level with lower-level reading ability. Students read books or passages of their choosing.
  • Cooperative learning is defined “as students working together, helping each other, sharing their ideas, and assisting their group in achieving mastery over the content material” (Ray, 2017, p. 45). Cooperative learning may exist of two or more students working together to accomplish a common goal or task. Cooperative learning usually increases student academic achievement and creative thinking skills. This strategy usually narrows or closes the reading performance gap.
  • Peer-Assisted Learning Strategy (PALS) is another name type of partner reading. This strategy is more scripted and is often used as an intervention strategy. Peer-assisted involves two students, one of higher-level and one of lower-level working together to accomplish a common task. This strategy calls for one passage or book that is accomplishable by both students (Fuchs, D. & Fuchs, L., 2005). The higher-leveled student reads the passage or book first to model how to read the passage. The lower-leveled student then reads the same passage and retells the passage just read. The PALS instructional strategy also includes paragraph shrinking and prediction relay.

Educators will usually see more growth in students who work in more scripted groups. Scripted group means that students in the group have been given direction as to what they need to accomplish, like reading a passage, discussing the character(s) of a story, orally answer or write questions or come up with a summary.

References

Fuchs, D. & Fuchs, L. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39, p 34-44.

Ray. J.S. (2022, June 9). The power of intentional partner reading. The Literacy Brain. https://theliteracybrain.com/2022/06/09/the-benefits-of-intentional-partner-reading/

Reading Rockets (2022). Paired (or partner) reading.  https://www.readingrockets.org/strategies/paired_reading

Building a Habit of Deep Reading

Instilling the love of reading or the want to read at leisure may be different for each student. Learning how to read is hard, exhausting for most students. Finding a motivating reason to learn how to read usually eases the fatigue and stress. Some students might develop the intrinsic push to read for pleasure. Some students might develop the intrinsic push to read to research about a particular topic. Some students might develop the intrinsic push to read to be like their friends. Others push themselves to not be embarrassed. In addition, modeling the love for reading usually increases student intrinsic motivation to learn how to read effectively.

Reading is a complex endeavor that includes many components working simultaneously, together. Written words are breathed in, swirled around, and processed using current brain connections to examine, analyze and make conclusions. The process of making meaning out of the written words usually takes fluid, efficient seconds. In these seconds your brain is moving the written words through different parts of the brain to bring coherent meaning. The meaning of the words may have a different twist or meaning for each person—this is dependent on their background knowledge and efficiency of their brain’s written language processing networks. Not all brains are developed equally. Part of the analysis process is student’s lexicon or dictionary. This is their personal reference book or computer catalog for them to use while understanding oral or written language. Student lexicon is constantly changing. Teachers assist in developing brain connections for processing written words through instruction.

Networks for reading efficiently are developed through instruction and practice. One of the ways that teachers assist in the development of brain connections for processing written words with coherency is modeling how to read. Each step of the reading process should be modeled to students, beginning in the pre/primary grades. In some cases, the modeling may need to take place several times. While modeling for students in small groups, invite students to follow along with their book. These are steps that you might use.

  • Choose a book that may be of interest to most students in the group. You will need to model all different types of written words, such as non-fiction, fiction, poetry, etc.
  • Take the time to review the contents of the book. This may not look the same each time. This is often referred to as a prereading or a book-walk-through. Look at the structure of the book. Look at the pictures. Look at the front and back covers. Look at the how the words are written in the book. Look for a table of contents. Look for gems in the back of the book, like index or definitions. Ask questions (wonder) about things you have found. Make predictions about the story based on the title or pictures. Make connections between this book and other books. Make connections between the book and student life experiences.
  • Read the book taking time to breathe in the words. You might read a sentence and take a moment before reading the next to analyze what you have read. You might ask a question. You might think about what might happen next or how this is connected to the previous sentence or paragraph. You might go back and reread a previous sentence to better understand the one you just read. This may take several smaller lessons to emphasize and develop the natural connections for comprehension. Breathing words develops and strengthens brain connections to process for written words for meaning. Many students need modeling, remodeling, and many opportunities to practice.
  • After reading the book or passage, model how to analyze or make the connections to form further conclusion(s). The following are some ideas of how you might analyze the words read: a) think aloud about what you read- ask questions like, what color is a bumble bee? What kinds clothes should you wear outside on a cold day? Should the dog be driving a car? Why does the character stay on the path? Why is there a title on this page? Does this make sense? What do you think the car looks like? Or what does it look when it’s raining? b) discuss your conclusion with friends, c) analyze individual words of the passage, d) analyze sentences read, e) analyze sentences with other sentences of the same passage, f) make connections between self and the passage, or g) write a written summary.

More students have the ability to take in and process oral language to understand what is read aloud to them than when they read the words silently. Encouraging students (especially struggling comprehension readers) to whisper-read the passage aloud usually increases their comprehension of the passage and assists in the development of the necessary brain connections to fluidly comprehend the written passage.

 

 

Advantages of Being Dyslexic

Dyslexic individuals will show similar traits in the classroom as they are learning to read and write.  Many dyslexic students struggle when they learn that the pictures that they have been developing into stories actually already have words that they must read.  Many will try to camouflage this transition; the camouflage will become apparent as students are held accountable for the words on the page.  The signs of dyslexia are there during students’ pre and primary school years.  Testing for phonology and comprehension has become more prevalent during the primary years, which lends to earlier intervention to ease the movement from oral language to written language.  The amount of the book exposure and student environment in and out of the classroom will usually change the symptoms and the intervention process.  Most dyslexics will become accomplished and earn a solid income.  Some of the more prevalent advantages of being dyslexia are noted below.

  1. Not visible to most. Classmates cannot usually visually see their “disability.”  Unfortunately, this can also be a disadvantage.
  2. Curious. Dyslexic individuals are usually curious.  I have a friend that began experimenting with how items fit together and thought it might be okay to take the screws out of the seat that held up his highchair.  Needless to say, that experiment came to crashing end.  His mechanical curiosity led to rebuilding engines during his elementary school years.
  3. Innovative and Creative. Dyslexic individuals are usually innovative and creative.  While your discussing how to use the pencil sharpener, dyslexics maybe trying to understand how the mechanisms within the pencil sharpener work and how they can improve the model.  Many will know how to fix the pencil sharpener without any prior knowledge of how a pencil sharpener works.  Many will create or modify items to suit their needs, as stated by Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, “There’s a creative energy to our approach which I’ve taken to politics to be bold and upfront on issues.  I’m not cautious, I’m not reckless, but I’m happy to take risks and that’s big part of being dyslexic” (Griggs, 2020, p. 3).
  4. Kinesthetically Wired. Dyslexic individuals usually see through their hands—kinesthetically.  They have the natural urge to touch and feel things, as it helps them put the item in their long-term memory and to contemplate how it works, what it’s for, etc.  Dyslexic individuals build pictures through their hands.  In addition, most need movement to keep the brain fresh with oxygen.
  5. Picture Thinkers. Dyslexic students are usually picture thinkers.  Many dyslexics have a photographic memory that can rewind an event.  Many dyslexic students will not feel the need to take notes, but can recall most of the information discussed.  They recall vocabulary words in pictures.  The pictures usually become attached to the words that describe the picture.  Sir Jackie Steward stated, “My dyslexic strength is attention to detail.  When your attention to detail is good you notice things other people don’t see as important, but these little things make all the difference.”
  6. Think outside the box. They have the ability to think or analyze things from different angles than others without dyslexia.   This lends to innovation and creativity in design and problem solving,
  7. 3-D vision. Many dyslexics have the ability to see an object in 3-D.  They can usually spin the object around and use this information to analyze the object.  This also lends to a sharper peripheral vision.
  8. Self-starters. Many are self-starters.  Individual environment will play a role in whether they use their skill of being a self-starter.  In the book, The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind, the parents gave their son the freedom and a safe environment to be a self-starter.  He went on the develop windmills out of the scraps/trash pile, which led to his country having the ability to pump water to grow crops and not be dependent on rain water.
  9. Perseverance. Many will endure their mistakes or trials before accomplishing their goal.  Many have very thick skin that allows them to endure the ridicule and numerous retries to better themselves and others.  Again, a person’s environment will play a role.
  10. Good Oral Language Skills. Many will have exceptional oral language skills. This was a major identifier of dyslexia in the late 1800s, early 1900s—student could have an intelligent conversation, but not be able to read the words in a book that corresponded with the conversation.  Many had, had an adequate education—most thought sitting in a formal school setting was a waste of their time.  Many probably experienced what Philip Schultz felt and described in his book, My Dyslexia, “He looked and spoke only to her, as if I were invisible.  It was the way I felt in school, listening to the teacher talk only to the other children, as if she didn’t think I would understand what she was saying, as if it was a waste of time talking to me” (p. 32).
  11. Can Learn. Dyslexics can learn how to use their prior knowledge of oral language to read and write.  Most will need systematic, explicit instruction to become average readers and writers.  Many will need this type of instruction to just hang-on or gain basic literacy skills.  Some will be able to absorb their rich environment to learn how to read.  This often takes different partnerships of teachers, parents, and community individuals, like tutors.  This will depend on the severity of the dyslexic symptoms and the individual’s environment.

References

Davis, R. (1997).  The Gift of Dyslexia.  New York, NY:  The Berkley Pub. Group

Griggs, K. (2020).  5 Reasons Why Dyslexics Make Powerful Changemakers.  LinkedIn post published May 30, 2020.

Kamkwamba, W. & Mealer, B. (2015). The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind.  New York, NY: Puffin Books.

Schultz, P. (2011). My Dyslexia. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.

 

 

Using Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Strategies in Instruction

When designing curriculum and instruction educators should include strategies that motivate students to participate in the learning process.  Instruction should move and increase natural or intrinsic motivation.  Students are motivated through touching, smelling, hearing, seeing, and tasting.  Students are also motivated through social connections and activities, such as friendships and group work.  Students are also motivated through organized purpose, such as assembling and preserving things.  Motivation begins, McClelland (1985) argued, with the initial stimulation or attention grabber.  Students also use their past academic histories to formulate the type of response and involvement level that they give to the lesson.  Students will seek opportunities and activities that lead to academic success and to avoid those that lead to failure or shame.  It is important to understand the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.

What is intrinsic motivation?  Intrinsic motivation is student’s internal drive.  Students are born with natural or intrinsic motivation—curiosity, ambition, and emotions (Wilson & Wilson, 1921).  Intrinsic motivation changes as students mature.  Students environmental interactions can have an effect intrinsic motivation.  Intrinsic motivation usually determines student academic achievement.  Gambrell (2011) suggested that reading instruction can increase intrinsic motivation levels through:  a) access to multiple genres, (b) choice, (c) time, (d) success in advanced level texts, (e) collaboration regarding the text, (f) relevance to the reading assignment, and (g) incentives.

What is extrinsic motivation?  Extrinsic or external motivation is the components within our environment that stimulate action.  Extrinsic motivation is dependent on the past and current learning environments of students.  Each student will have different extrinsic motivators that can be used to enhance the learning process in the classroom, for example a student who traveled to China can share their experience adding to the curriculum knowledge of the lesson.  The location of the instruction can impact the lesson.  Students who are presented a lesson in a noisy hallway may be less engaged in the lesson.  A student may enjoy writing using computer software better than using a pencil and paper.  Students may be more willing to listen and focus on the lesson if they know that their recess will be shortened.  Extrinsic motivation can be used to develop intrinsic motivation.

The following instructional strategies have shown to increase student motivation towards participation in the learning process:

Schedules and Routines. Develop classroom schedules and routines to increase student motivation and achievement.  McClelland (1985) argued that children from homes where parents follow consistent schedules, such as when to eat and use the bathroom, have higher achievement rates in school.  Children begin to learn how to regulate their needs through regular schedules.  Weiner (1974) also argued that reinforcement schedules assist students in developing higher levels of cognition.  He believed that reinforcement schedules enforce positive behaviors and redirect negatives behaviors.

Incentives and Goals. Incentives and goals can increase intrinsic motivation.  Incentives can increase students’ intrinsic motivation in learning how to read (Gambrell, 2001).  Tangible rewards should be relevant to the activity, such as giving a book to a student in order to honor his or her reading achievement.  Students are usually more motivated to meet a goal with a checklist of requirements for the goal or assignments (Servilio, 2009).  The checklist gives students a road-map of what should be accomplished and what has already been accomplished. When using a checklist, students learn organization and responsibility skills.  Students with a goal and purpose have a higher level of motivation towards learning skills that are difficult to them.

Collaboration in Small Groups. Research suggests that student motivation often increases when students collaborate with others in small group settings.  Student motivation increases when students collaborate with and assist their classmates in exploring, analyzing, and reflecting on their chosen topic (Hsiao, Lin, Fang, & Li, 2010).  Students with higher interpersonal skills benefit more from working in small groups than from working alone.  Mihandoost, Elias, Nor, and Mahmud (2011) found that small group work increases student motivation in reading for students with dyslexia.  Intrinsic motivation improves when students use technology to complete assignments in small groups that consist of one student and one instructor or two students (Reed-Swale, 2009).

Student Choice. Student motivation increases when students are given choices within the instructional lesson (Chu, Tse, Loh, & Chow, 2011; Gambrell, 2011; Mihandoost, Elias, Nor, & Mahmud, 2011; Schiefele, Schaffner, Möller, & Wigfield, 2012; Servilio, 2009).  Researchers argued that student achievement in reading comprehension increases when students are given the opportunity to read literature of their own choosing.  Students’ engagement in reading instruction increases when students are given the opportunity to make choices about how to complete the assignment during differentiated instruction (Servilio, 2009).  Student motivation in reading increases when students are given the option of choosing the reading texts (Gambrell, 2011).

Relatable and Relevant. Teachers should select literature that is relatable.  Students can better relate to characters through drama.  Students are more motivated to understand the meaning of a literature passage when they are given the opportunity to recite and define the literature passage.  Wilson and Wilson (1921) believed that students are motivated to strengthen their reading skills when they learn about different subjects they are interested in, such as baseball or bugs.  Wilson and Wilson also suggested that oral reading or songs and games can motivate students during English language arts lessons.

The right instructional strategies can improve student motivation towards learning.  Instructional strategies should be developed to increase ownership of the lesson.  Instructional strategies should energize and spark interest of the topic.

 References

Chu, S.K.W., Tse, S.K., Loh, E.K.Y., & Chow, K. (2011).  Collaborative inquiry project-based              learning: Effects on reading ability and interests. Library & Information Science                            Research, 33(3), 236-243.  doi: 10.1016/j.list.2010.09.008

Gambrel, L. (2011).  Motivation in the school reading curriculum.  Journal of Reading                          Education, 37(1), 5-14.

Hsiao, H.-S., Lin, C.-C., Fang, R.-T., & Li, K.-J. (2010). Location based services for outdoor            ecological learning system: Design and implementation. Educational Technology &                    Society, 13(4), 98-111.

McClelland, D. (1985). Human motivation.  New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mihandoost, Z., Elias, H., Nor, S., & Mahmud, R. (2011).  The effectiveness of the                              intervention program on reading fluency and reading motivation of students with                   dyslexia. Asian Social  Science 7(3), 187-199.

Reed-Swale, T.W (2009). Engaging digital natives in a digital world teaching more than             web design. Synergy Learning, 22(128), 22-25. 

Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Moller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading                         motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research               Quarterly,47(4), 427-463.  doi: 10.1002/RRQ.030

Servilio, K. (2009).  You get to choose! Motivating students to read through differentiated          instruction.  Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 5(5), Article 5.  Retrieved November 7,             2012 from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/vol5/iss5/art5

Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory.  Morristown, NJ:                     General Learning Press.

Wilson, H.B., & Wilson, G.M. (1921). The motivation of school work. Cambridge, MA: The                  Riverside Press.

 

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

Facebook
Twitter