Structure Literacy, Pillars 5 & 6

Pillar 5 of structured literacy instruction is syntax or the study of sentence structure.  The principles that dictate the sequence and function of words in a sentence.  These principles are also referred to as the mechanics, grammar, and variation of a sentence.  The more common parts of a sentence are:

  • Verb-describes the action
  • Adverb-modifies a verb, helps to clarify or further define a verb      Example: warmly, quiet, loudly, today, outside
  • Noun-person, place or thing
  • Adjective-modifies a noun, adjusts the meaning or further defines the noun to better clarify the meaning                                                                        Example: beautiful, dark, old
  • Article-modify a noun, like an adjective Example: a, an, the
  • Preposition-usually precedes a noun and in relation to another word      Example: at, in, on, with, for, about, after, of
  • Conjunction-connecting words, they connect clauses and sentences Example: and, but, if                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           One form of syntax is sentence diagramming.

See the source image

commons.wikimedia.org

Pillar 6 of structured literacy is semantics or study of the meaning of words, symbols, and units of words.  A person’s lexicon stores the meaning of words, symbols, and units of words—vocabulary.  People begin to develop their lexicon at birth. Individuals attach meaning to tones of sound.  These meanings are adjusted as individuals are introduced to new tones or meanings.  Individuals transfer the meaning of tones (voice) to symbols (print) as they learn how to read and write.  To better understand words and groups of words teachers often use concept maps to examine the definition of a word.   Students identify the related synonyms and antonyms of the word.  Students often identify or attach pictures to a word or groups of words.  Semantics assist in attaching inferred meaning to written and oral verbiage.  Semantics can include morphology.

References

Birsh, J.R. (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills.  Baltimore:  Paul H. Brookes Pub Co.

Henry, Marcia K. (2010).  Unlocking literacy effective decoding and spelling instruction.   Baltimore:  Paul H. Brookes Pub Co.

International Dyslexia Association, dyslexiaida.org/what-is-structured-literacy/

Moats, L. (2000). Speech to print. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Pub Co.

 

What is Structure Literacy Instruction – Pillars 1 & 2

Structured literacy instruction includes six pillars or parts of language development-oral and written.  Structured literacy instruction is taught explicitly and systematically, beginning with Pillar 1. Structured literacy may be used to teach literacy at all levels of instruction, such as Tier 1-general classroom, Tier 2-intervention usually taught in small groups, Tier 3-intervention usually taught in one-on-one group setting, or special education.  The number of levels for instruction in a RTI model may be different for each school, depending on the learning needs of the current students and the available resources.

Pillar 1 is phonology, the study of spoken sounds (phonemes)—rules of how sounds are encoded, such as why these sounds follow this pattern to form this sound(s). Individuals should have phoneme awareness skills before learning how to read.  This is the ability to hear, identify, and manipulated individuals sounds in spoken words.  Phoneme awareness is part of phonological awareness.  Phonological awareness is the ability to process and manipulate letter sounds, rhyming words, and segmenting of sounds within words. The study of phonology usually increases student ability to spell, pronounce, and comprehend written words. 

Pillar 2 is sound-symbol correspondences or the relationship(s) between phoneme(s) and grapheme(s).  This may be referred to as phonics instruction that teaches predictable or the constant rules of sound-symbol correspondences to produce written language.  At this stage students learn one-on-one correspondence, for example the written letter B represents this phoneme or sound.  Students begin decoding and encoding words as they begin to learn the sound-symbol correspondences.  Student knowledge of the phoneme(s) and grapheme(s) relationships usually increases student ability to read, comprehend, and spell written language.

I will include pillars 3 and 4 of structured literacy instruction in my next post.

References

Birsh, J.R. (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills. Baltimore:  Paul H. Brookes Pub Co.

Henry, Marcia K. (2010).  Unlocking literacy effective decoding and spelling instruction.  Baltimore:  Paul H. Brookes Pub Co.

International Dyslexia Association, dyslexiaida.org/what-is-structured-literacy/

Moats, L. (2000). Speech to print. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Pub Co.

Diagnosing Dyslexia

The information in this blog is focused on developmental dyslexia, which is acquired through genetics.  Usually, students who acquire dyslexia through environmental causes can be flagged or diagnosed using the same information.

The definition of dyslexia is:

Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurobiological in origin.  It is characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities.  These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective classroom instruction.  Secondary consequences may include problems in reading comprehension and reduced reading experience that can impede growth of vocabulary and background knowledge (International Dyslexia Association, 2002).

I am not big fan of labeling students for various reasons, but labeling must occur if the student is not getting the support and instruction that they need to acquire literacy skills.  Students will continue to struggle to acquire and use grade-level literacy skills, if they do not learn foundational literacy skills during their early elementary school days.  Most students can receive the support and instruction that they need to remain at grade-level through a response to intervention (RTI) or multitiered program.   RTI is a program that when implemented with fidelity can provide instructional lessons at student learning level, in addition to their regular classroom literacy instruction.  Some students will need more intense intervention that may include special education services, which requires the development of a 504 or IEP plan.  This will depend on your school’s literacy program and student learning needs.

Diagnosing dyslexia can be tricky and complex.  Dyslexia affects approximately 3 of every 20 students.  Dyslexia is blind to ethnicity and socioeconomic status.  Some students will “scream” dyslexia, many will not. Some students will never be diagnosed.  Children of parents diagnosed with developmental dyslexia have a 50% higher chance of having dyslexia.  It is also important to note that students can show traits of dyslexia, but not have developmental dyslexia.

Diagnosing dyslexia usually begins with a screening of student literacy skills.  A screening is a series of short probes or assessments used to learn student reading ability.   Most schools universally screen students three times a year.  Universal screenings can flag students who may have dyslexia, this will depend on the reading probes used to screen students.  Some probes have a stronger correlation to reading deficits normally found in individuals diagnosed with dyslexia.  Student knowledge of phonological awareness is a stronger flag until Grade 2, when rapid automatized naming tests (RAN) or reading fluency probes become a stronger flag (Ray, 2017).  Usually students that show a deficit in decoding nonsense words are dyslexic.  Teacher observations of student reading ability can strengthen the validity of a word decoding outcome.  There are also “private” on-line screenings.  Use on-line screening with caution, as not all screenings are valid.  The Shaywitz DyslexiaScreenTM was developed by Dr. Sally Shaywitz, a professor and researcher in Learning Development at Yale University. This screening can be used for students in kindergarten and Grade 1.  The screener can be found at https://dyslexia.yale.edu/, the Yale Center for Dyslexia and Creativity.  Students who show signs of literary deficits or traits of dyslexia may be assessed deeper or more extensively by a trained educational professional.

Diagnosing Dyslexia

The Gillingham (1955) formula of diagnosing dyslexia was developed by Anne Gillingham while she was working for Dr. Samuel Orton in the early 1900s.  She believed that standardized achievement tests were not a valid method to diagnose students’ reading deficits or to place students in remediation.  Gillingham determined that the following seven assessments should be given to students one year before beginning reading instruction: (a) intelligence, (b) optical or vision, (c) family history, (d) motor pattern or skills, (e) visual sensory recall skills, (f) auditory sensory recall skills, and (g) kinesthetic sensory skills.  The data from each assessment should be compiled and analyzed for each child.  The child is then placed into a classroom setting, based on the analyzed outcome of these assessment.  Gillingham noted that when students were assessed correctly and place in the proper programs, many of the emotional issues disappeared.  Gillingham also noted that occasionally the analyzed placement needed to be revisited as the child progressed through their formal education.  Gillingham (1956) believed that teachers in the regular classroom were the first to identify students at-risk for reading acquisition.

Today, dyslexia can be diagnosed by a neuropsychologist who specializes in educational disabilities, in particular dyslexia.  The process includes three or four hours of testing that can be quit tiring for students.  Most public schools do not have licensed psychologists trained to administer the depth of assessment required to diagnose dyslexia.  Students can also be diagnosed using MRI imaging.  This method of diagnosis should be used with caution, as very few people know how to conduct or correctly read the MRI screening images for dyslexia traits.

Ray, J.S. (2017).  Tier 2 interventions for students in grades 1-3 identified as at-risk in reading.  (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).  Retrieved from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3826/

What is Dyslexia?

Dyslexia has been woven in the fabric of society for centuries.  Dyslexia often goes unnoticed, as the severity or effects of dyslexia are different for each individual.  Some individuals are better at masking the effects than others.  This has made defining dyslexia a challenge.

In my research of dyslexia, I stumbled upon Dr. James Hinshelwood, an optical surgeon who worked at the Glasgow Eye Infirmary in Scotland during the 1890s through the early 1920s.  Some of his findings and definitions of word-blindness help to better understand the scope of the learning issue and why the definition has been hard to corral.

The following notes are from Hinshelwood’s (1917) research about individuals who struggle at learning how to read that were referred to the Glasgow Eye Infirmary or to an ophthalmologist for an examination.  As a result, Hinshelwood discovered that one student could not read more than two or three words by sight.  The student could only read if he or she was allowed to spell the words aloud one letter at a time or by moving his or her lips because the voiced word engaged the auditory memory, and the lip movement engaged speech or kinesthetic memory.  Hinshelwood also examined several students with similar problems.  For example, one student had healthy and normal vision, but he could not read any of the letters of the alphabet.  However, he could recite the alphabet by memory.  He could read a few words by spelling the words out letter by letter.  When he viewed the same word a few sentences later, he did not recognize the word.  The student had a good memory and excelled in his other subjects.  Hinshelwood’s work at the Glasgow Eye Infirmary led to the discovery of word-blindness.

Hinshelwood (1917) believed that congenital word-blindness was difficult to fully comprehend and was often misdiagnosed.  Hinshelwood noted that a German named Kussmaul determined that word blindness occurred when “complete text blindness may exist, although the power of sight, the intellect, and the powers of speech are intact” (p. 3).  Hinshelwood also noted that word-blindness meant “a condition in which with normal vision and therefore seeing the letters and words distinctly, an individual is no longer able to interpret written or printed language” (p. 4).  He believed that people could develop word-blindness as a result of family genetics or through injury.  Hinshelwood focused on the genetic causes of word-blindness, which led to the following definitions.

Hinshelwood (1917) defined three different degrees of congenital word-blindness: (a) congenital word-blindness, (b) congenital dyslexia, and (c) congenital alexia. He defined congenital word-blindness as the “pure and grave cases of defect” (Hinshelwood, 1917, p. 70).  Hinshelwood describes congenital dyslexia as a “slighter degrees of defect” (p. 70) or “great difficulty in interpreting written and printed symbols (Hinshelwood, 1900, p. 48).  Professor Berlin of Stuttgart introduced the term dyslexia to describe a group of patients struggling to learn how to read, “due to the development of cerebral disease” (p. 60).  Hinshelwood believed that congenital alexia was a defect in the visual memory center. The term congenital was noted to distinguish between natural and acquired.

Hinshelwood (1917) argued that each student diagnosed with word-blindness or dyslexia will have similar yet different characteristics and that diagnosis of students with word-blindness should begin in the regular education classroom.  Teachers in these classrooms should refer those students who are struggling with learning to read to an eye doctor for a visual examination.

After years of research that produce multiple definitions of dyslexia the International Dyslexia Association (IDA) developed a Definition Consensus Project or a committee to corral the definition of dyslexia.  On November 12, 2002, IDA adopted the following definition:

Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurobiological in origin. It is characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective classroom instruction. Secondary consequences may include problems in reading comprehension and reduced reading experience that can impede growth of vocabulary and background knowledge.

After many years of research there are valid methods of diagnosing dyslexia, but it can still elude diagnosis.  I will discuss more about how to diagnose dyslexia in future posts.

 

References

Hinshelwood, James. (1900). Letter-, word- and mind-blindness. London: H. K. Lewis.

Hinshelwood, James. (1917). Congenital word-blindness.  London: H. K. Lewis.

Definition of Dyslexia (2002). International Dyslexia Association, Retrieved from:  https://dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/, July 11, 2018.

 

 

Development of Reading Connections in the Brain

Translating written language into meaning or the process of reading is like completing a dot to dot picture. The brain has to connect the right dots or take the right highways and sideroads to deeply or fully comprehend written language. The complex process of connecting the right dots begins at conception, as brain connections are organized or cataloged through predetermined genetic design. The original or genetic organization can be altered or changed through a child’s environment.

Individuals are not naturally wired with the connections to process letters into usable information. The brain has to develop those connections to process written letters into useable information, which begins at birth through oral language. A child’s verbal communication connections serve as a reference for the process of developing written processing connections. Some children can more easily develop the right connections to use written language. Meaning they pick up letter names and their corresponding sounds and are able to build words and their meanings into usage information without purposeful instruction. Most children need planned instruction to learn each letter and the letter’s corresponding sound(s) and how to develop letters into meaningful words. Most children also need planned instruction to break down words into sounds and meaning. And some children will need explicit, systematic instruction to fully digest letters, words, and sentences into useable information. Understanding what type of literacy instruction children need will follow in a future post.

References

International Dyslexia Association Conference; Dr. Louisa Moats, Dr. F. Hoeft, & Dr. K. Pugh
Binet, A. & Simon, T. (1916) The development of intelligence in children. Baltimore: Williams
& Wilkins Co.
Fowler, W. (1983). Potentials of childhood, Vol 1. Lexington, MA: D.C. Health & Co.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Vygotsky, L. (1934). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

 

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)